One in eight Australian households finding insurance unaffordable due to climate change
Driven by accelerating climate change, communities across the country are being hit hard by extreme weather events and increasing insurance premiums.
Two new research reports released this week by the Actuaries Institute, called the Home Insurance Affordability Update and Funding for Flood Costs: Affordability, Availability and Public Policy Options show an estimated 1.24 million Australian households (nearly one in eight) are facing an insurance affordability crisis. This is an increase of 240,000 households when compared to the last time this study was conducted in March 2022.
These 1.24 million households are spending two months of their annual income on home insurance, which is more than seven times what the average household spends.
For those living in disaster-prone areas, including the Northern Rivers region, north Queensland and Western Australia, insurance premiums have risen up to 50% in 12 months.
Fossil fuels like coal, oil and gas are the main driver of accelerating climate change, which is making extreme weather events like bushfires, heatwaves and droughts more frequent and severe.
Nicki Hutley, economist and Councillor at the Climate Council said: “These figures really bring home how difficult accelerating climate change is making insurance affordability for so many, particularly those who are most vulnerable.”
The Climate Council’s research into the mental health toll of compounding and worsening climate change, released last year, showed that 1 in 20 Australians had cancelled their insurance coverage because it was no longer affordable.
“Experiencing a disaster is difficult enough, but now many Australians are discovering their insurance doesn't cover them for disaster or is insufficient,” said Ms Hutley.
“A growing number of households, and particularly low-income households, can no longer afford premiums at all. This means many families affected by a disaster can find themselves facing huge bills with no means to pay them, sometimes without a safe place to stay, all while processing the trauma of the event itself.”
“We need to direct more funding to resilience measures in homes and communities to reduce risks, rather than relying on post disaster recovery. This is better for communities, the environment and the economy, and a necessary step to make insurance more affordable.”